The item you have requested is not currently available in English and you have been redirected to the next available page. You may use your browser's back button to return to the item you were viewing.
Country desks feature Dentons lawyers in one jurisdiction with a particular focus or experience in another jurisdiction.
Learn more about our Canada capabilities
Learn more about our United States capabilities
Learn more about our Latin America and the Caribbean capabilities
Learn more about our Europe capabilities
Learn more about our United Kingdom capabilities
Learn more about our Central and Eastern Europe capabilities
Learn more about our Russia, CIS and the Caucasus capabilities
Learn more about our Africa capabilities
Learn more about our Middle East capabilities
Learn more about our Central Asia capabilities
Learn more about our China capabilities
Learn more about our Asia Pacific capabilities
Learn more about our Australia capabilities
At Dentons, we bring together top tier talent found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal expertise. Start by clicking here
Dentons ranked #1 patent prosecution firm in the US
Juristat ranked Dentons number one on its 2017 list of the top 100 patent prosecution law firms, a jump from 16th place last year.
Court clamps down on ‘smash and grab’
Akin Akinbode of Dentons discusses key cases that provide lessons in respect of the payment process. Smash and grab approaches will not always work, they warn.
Using loyalty programs as a promotional strategy in Colombia
The Superintendency of Industry and Commerce (SIC) recently defined the rules applicable to loyalty programs in Colombia.
The naked truth: Why your supply chain could leave you exposed
If you are a business owner dealing with suppliers, you are potentially at risk of penalty for corruption related offences. While the response of countries to corruption offences differs around the world, most countries consider such conduct to be unacceptable, and in most cases illegal.
Saudi Arabia Update - January 2017
Welcome to our monthly update which provides a recap of recent legal developments, including finance and capital market developments, as well as updates on new legislation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Starting your career as a student at Dentons exposes you to a world of experience and opportunities
With 125+ locations in 50+ countries, Dentons is home to top-tier talent that is found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal experience. Working with Dentons, you will have the opportunity to learn from the best lawyers in the industry at the largest law firm in the world.
Dentons plays a role in 4 of Lexpert's top 10 legal deals in Canada for 2016
Dentons is proud to congratulate our lawyers who played an instrumental role in the four deals included as part of Lexpert’s Top 10 Deals for 2016.
Dentons reinforces its arbitration presence in Germany
Global law firm Dentons has expanded its International Arbitration practice in Germany with the recruitment of US-qualified partner Amy C. Kläsener.
Dentons hosts exclusive dinner with Canada's 22nd Prime Minister, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper
Dentons' Middle East partners hosted a client dinner on 26 January 2017 with The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, Canada's 22nd Prime Minister.
Late payment continues to be a scourge on the construction industry and evidence of its debilitating effects abounds both in the industry press and in court reports. A recent article published in Construction News highlighted the bleak statistic that one in four SMEs is at risk of collapse due to late payment (see this Construction News article) and a late payments survey carried out by Textura Europe and shared with Construction News (click here) found that more than a third of main contractors, sub-contractors, clients and consultants are paid more than 60 days after issuing invoices.
It seems therefore that the payment requirements set out by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (as amended by Part 8 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009) (the Construction Act) to improve cash flow have been of little help for some although the government's continued efforts to address payment issues are evidenced by various initiatives including:
Late payments often lead to litigation but what is surprising is that parties to construction contracts do not more often take advantage of the protection – and remedies – provided by the Construction Act, if only the parties would incorporate and implement the correct payment procedures in their construction contracts.
In a recent High Court case, for example, (Wilson and Sharp Investments Ltd v. Harbour View Developments Ltd  EWCA Civ 1030), an unpaid contractor tried to recover payment on unpaid invoices by attempting to wind up the employer's business. This attempt failed in part because the employer had a genuine cross claim and the payment was disputed. However, the employer had not issued pay less notices and, in the absence of these notices, the contractor's notified sums would have been payable by the final date for payment in each case. It is therefore difficult to see why the contractor did not seek to obtain the full payment using the comparatively simpler statutory adjudication procedure and the enforcement procedures offered by the Technology and Construction Court (TCC).
Ignoring the adjudication procedure introduced by the Construction Act is especially surprising in the light of the TCC's strong support for adjudication as shown by the recent decision in RMP Construction Services Ltd v. Chalcroft Ltd  EWHC 3737, in which Mr Justice Stuart-Smith said: "… the adjudication system was and is meant to provide quick and effective remedies to parties, equally accessible to those who are legally represented as to those who are not; and I bear in mind that the system now covers not only written contracts but also oral contracts which increases the likelihood that they may be mis-described" (paragraph 51 of the judgment).
The Wilson decision is also a reminder that parties to construction contracts should give serious consideration to payment procedures when drafting the contract and keep in mind that the Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/649) will apply if the payment terms of the contract do not comply with the Construction Act. Once in place, the contract should then be a key reference point throughout the construction project to ensure that the agreed payment procedures are operated correctly and promptly, that payment notices are issued on time and that appropriate pay less notices are issued if there is a reason for non-payment.
Should payment not be forthcoming when due, the RMP decision gives ample reassurance that the courts will enforce an adjudication decision promptly. Those who have stuck to the payment procedures will be better equipped to recover money due by using the adjudication procedures if initial discussions prove fruitless. Equally, those employers who do not consider payment to be due will be able to withhold payment effectively – if they issues pay less notices correctly.
The complex contractual relationships in the construction industry, combined with the vagaries of our economy and fluctuating commercial fortunes, dictate that late payment will continue to be an issue. Creating and implementing reliable payment systems that comply with the provisions of the Construction Act can help to reduce the risks of being a late payment casualty.
1 The goals of the Prompt Payment Code and the timetable for action were set out in this BIS letter of 15 March 2015.
The URL of this tweet is below. Copy it to easily share with friends.
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more