The item you have requested is not currently available in English and you have been redirected to the next available page. You may use your browser's back button to return to the item you were viewing.
Country desks feature Dentons lawyers in one jurisdiction with a particular focus or experience in another jurisdiction.
Learn more about our Canada capabilities
Learn more about our United States capabilities
Learn more about our Latin America and the Caribbean capabilities
Learn more about our Europe capabilities
Learn more about our United Kingdom capabilities
Learn more about our Central and Eastern Europe capabilities
Learn more about our Russia, CIS and the Caucasus capabilities
Learn more about our Africa capabilities
Learn more about our Middle East capabilities
Learn more about our Central Asia capabilities
Learn more about our China capabilities
Learn more about our Asia Pacific capabilities
Learn more about our Australia capabilities
At Dentons, we bring together top tier talent found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal expertise. Start by clicking here
Lexpert recognizes 27 Dentons lawyers as "Canada’s Leading Energy Lawyers”
Dentons is proud to congratulate an outstanding 27 lawyers who are listed as “Canada’s Leading Energy Lawyers” by Lexpert, in its recent special edition on Energy.
Venture Capital fund managers may begin operations in record time in Singapore
Although a venture capital fund may be prepared to invest in a new country, lengthy requirements to set up operations may risk the loss of valuable business opportunities.
IRS issues cost of living adjustments to retirement plan limits
The IRS has just issued the cost of living adjustments for various retirement plan limitations that will take effect either on January 1, 2018, or for the 2018 plan year.
Parallel debt structures in South Africa
Bridging the gap between English law, international market practice and South African law.
Three Key Things to Consider on Motions to Disqualify
Motions to disqualify can have the effect of distracting attorneys from their full devotion to their client’s claims or defenses.
Starting your career as a student at Dentons exposes you to a world of experience and opportunities
With 125+ locations in 50+ countries, Dentons is home to top-tier talent that is found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal experience. Working with Dentons, you will have the opportunity to learn from the best lawyers in the industry at the largest law firm in the world.
Dentons wins EuropaProperty’s CEE Investment & Green Building "Law Firm of the Year" Award for the seventh time in a row
Dentons won the "Law Firm of the Year" award at the 7th annual CEE Investment & Green Building Awards ceremony organized by EuropaProperty.
Dentons is recognized as a leading financial law firm in this year’s IFLR1000 guide
Dentons is pleased to announce that 11 of our lawyers have been ranked in this year’s IFLR1000, the guide to the world's leading financial and corporate law firms and lawyers, two of whom are receiving this honour for the first time..
Dentons wins Diversity Law Firm of the Year in Australia
Dentons’ diversity achievements have again been recognised with the Firm awarded Diversity Law Firm of the Year at the Lawyers Weekly Women in Law Awards 2017.
After President Obama announced in an op-ed on Monday that it was coming soon, the US Department of Labor's Wage & Hour Division published its long-awaited proposed overtime regulation. This proposed regulation addresses the question of which executive, administrative and professional employees are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime (and minimum wage) protections.
Some estimates suggest that nearly 22 million workers are subject to being excluded from overtime protections under regulations promulgated by the Bush Administration in 2004. In a March 2013 memorandum to Secretary of Labor Tom Perez, President Obama directed the Labor Department to update the regulations, narrow the exemptions, and simplify the rules so that employers would be better able to comply. This proposed regulation is an attempt to carry out that mandate.
The centerpiece of the proposal is an increase in the salary threshold for exempting executive, administrative and professional employees. Under existing law, employees can earn as little as $455 per week and still be exempt. Under the proposed rule, the threshold would be set at the 40th percentile of full-time salary workers, which is $951 ($49,452 for a full-year worker) now, or $970 ($50,440 for a full-year worker) in the first quarter of 2016. The Labor Department estimates that roughly five million workers will be newly covered by federal overtime protections as a result of this change alone. Given that some advocates and Democratic members of Congress had been pushing for an increase to a threshold of $69,000 for a full-time worker, the proposed regulation seems to take a moderate position that almost returns the salary threshold to its inflation-adjusted level in 1975. The proposal would also index the new salary threshold to the Consumer Price Index or fix it at the level of the 40th percentile of full-time salary workers—in other words, the threshold would rise automatically as these measures increase.
The proposal also invites comments about how much time employees should have to spend on executive, administrative or professional work before they can be exempt. Under existing rules, this "exempt" work is supposed to be the employee's "primary duty," but there is no bright line test for "primary." Some courts have held that as little as 1 percent or 5 percent of an employee's time spent on exempt duties can be enough. By contrast, the department's proposal asks commenters to consider California's rule that essentially says that "primary" means 50 percent or more of time is spent on executive, administrative or professional duties.
Apparently responding to strong objections from the employer community, and in an effort to keep the public's focus on the higher salary threshold, the department's proposal does not advance specific changes to the substantive duties that constitute the work of executive, administrative, or professional employees. In order to be an executive, administrative, or professional employee, of course, the individual's job must consist of executive, administrative, or professional duties. Employers worry that changes to these substantive duties tests could result in a great deal of new litigation as they and their employees struggle to understand how to adapt jobs and job descriptions to new rules. By contrast, the department predicts the increase in the salary threshold will reduce the amount of litigation because millions fewer workers will be subject to the duties test. They will be covered by the overtime rules simply because of their salary levels.
In an uncommon turn for a formal proposed regulation, the department's proposal asks the public to express its views on the substantive duties tests without giving commenters anything to which they can react. Because administrative law requires that the public (and the regulated community, in particular) have full notice and an opportunity to comment about significant changes to regulations, the lack of a specific proposal (or set of proposals) in this area likely means that the department's final regulation will not address these substantive duties tests.
The public has 60 days to comment on this proposed regulation, although you should expect a fight about whether more time will be allowed. Unless Congress decides to kill the rule before it comes out, which is unlikely at this stage, you can expect a final overtime regulation around this time in 2016.
The URL of this tweet is below. Copy it to easily share with friends.
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more