The item you have requested is not currently available in English and you have been redirected to the next available page. You may use your browser's back button to return to the item you were viewing.
Country desks feature Dentons lawyers in one jurisdiction with a particular focus or experience in another jurisdiction.
Learn more about our Canada capabilities
Learn more about our United States capabilities
Learn more about our Latin America and the Caribbean capabilities
Learn more about our Europe capabilities
Learn more about our United Kingdom capabilities
Learn more about our Central and Eastern Europe capabilities
Learn more about our Russia, CIS and the Caucasus capabilities
Learn more about our Africa capabilities
Learn more about our Middle East capabilities
Learn more about our Central Asia capabilities
Learn more about our China capabilities
Learn more about our ASEAN capabilities
Learn more about our Asia Pacific capabilities
Learn more about our Australia capabilities
At Dentons, we bring together top tier talent found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal expertise. Start by clicking here
Dentons lawyers named in Who’s Who Legal Thought Leaders: Global Elite 2019 guide
Dentons is proud to congratulate six of our lawyers who have been recognised by Who’s Who Legal in its Thought Leaders: Global Elite 2019 guide.
With all the changes and announcements in 2018, our Eurozone Hub has collated the following supervisory outlook for 2019 as a non-exhaustive “Playbook” for Banking Union Supervised Institutions and other regulated market participants already based in or otherwise relocating to the EU and/or the Eurozone.
Canada Federal Budget 2019
In the wake of the release of the much-anticipated 2019 Federal Budget, members of Dentons’ Tax group, together with a team at Wolters Kluwer, have prepared a Special Report which provides a detailed analysis and concise summary of the changes featured in the Budget.
Global tax guide to doing business in... 2019
Our Global tax guide to doing business in… highlights the complexities of corporate tax systems in 28 countries across Africa, the Americas, Asia Pacific, Australia and Europe.
US Policy Scan 2019
In Policy Scan 2019, Dentons' US Public Policy team's annual analysis of the legislative and political landscape, we take a close look at the issues, questions and conflicts that will dominate the dialogue on Capitol Hill and in the White House over the coming year.
Starting your career as a student at Dentons exposes you to a world of experience and opportunities
With 175 locations in 78 countries, Dentons is home to top-tier talent that is found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal experience. Working with Dentons, you will have the opportunity to learn from the best lawyers in the industry at the largest law firm in the world.
The Legal 500 EMEA 2019 recognizes over 130 Dentons lawyers
The 2019 edition of The Legal 500 Europe, Middle East and Africa has recognized 133 Dentons lawyers, of which 89 have been included in the elite “Leading Lawyers” list, while 44 are listed as “Next Generation Lawyers”.
Dentons launches Market Insights publication: “Digital Transformation and the Digital Consumer”
Dentons, the world’s largest law firm, has launched a new Market Insights publication entitled “Digital Transformation and the Digital Consumer”, which examines the legal implications of the online economy.
Dentons ranks across 68 tables securing 109 individual and 43 practice rankings in Chambers USA
Global law firm Dentons earned 109 individual and 43 practice rankings - a 20% increase over last year - in the most recent edition of Chamber USA.
By its much anticipated yet hardly surprising judgment in Forge Group Power Pty Limited (in liquidation)(receivers and managers appointed) v General Electric International Inc  NSWSC 52, the Supreme Court of New South Wales has again shone a bright light on the importance of perfection of security interests under the PPSA, and the dramatic consequences that follow for failing to do so by reason of the PPSA vesting rules. Indeed, the failure to register in this case has had multi-million dollar consequences.
Apart from the money at stake, the case is somewhat unremarkable except that the court has provided some helpful guidance on:
In March 2013, General Electric International Inc. agreed to lease to Forge Group Power Pty Limited four mobile gas turbine generator sets for a fixed term, and to provide to Forge installation, commissioning and demobilisation services.
The initial term of the lease was for two years with the ability to extend for a further 6 months, and then for a further 18 months after that.
Shortly after the turbines had been installed Forge appointed voluntary administrators.
A little over a month after the voluntary administrators were appointed, Forge went into liquidation.
As at the appointment of the administrators, GE had not registered a security interest on the PPSR in respect to the turbines.
Accordingly, Forge (by its liquidators) sought a declaration from the court that any security interest that GE had in the turbines vested in Forge immediately before the appointment of the administrators in accordance with the relevant provisions of the PPSR.
Unsurprisingly for anyone with any knowledge of the case, and consistent with earlier PPSA decisions with similar factual circumstances, the court determined the turbines had vested in Forge, which meant GE lost any interest it had in them, allowing the liquidators to realise those assets for the benefit of all of Forge’s creditors.
That outcome aside, as noted, helpfully the court has given some useful guidance on some key PPSA concepts.
GE argued that it was not regularly engaged in the business of leasing in Australia at the time the Lease was entered into. If this argument was correct, the arrangement between GE and Forge would not have been a PPS Lease (as defined by the PPSA), putting the PPSA vesting rules out of play.
The court concluded that the evidence demonstrated that GE was clearly regularly engaged in leasing and that the arrangement between GE and Forge was a PPS Lease.
The court’s view was:
The Court went on to say that engaging in the business of leasing is a concept of wider reach than merely entering into leases. For example, a business that does not actually enter into any leases could still be considered to have regularly engaged in leasing if it has the infrastructure, ability and willingness to enter into leasing transactions.
The Court noted that the correct approach is to recognise the frequency or repetitiveness of the transactions as a factor relevant to, and in an appropriate case a critical factor in, the assessment of whether the leasing business being engaged in is ‘regular’. But it is not to be equated with it.
GE also argued that the turbines had become a ‘fixture’ to the land which, if correct, meant the PPSA didn’t apply because ‘fixtures’ are excluded from the operation of the PPSA. This was perhaps a strange argument given that, in effect, GE were submitting that they had lost title to the turbines by reason of affixation.
The court’s view was that the words “affixed to the land” in the definition of fixtures in s 10 of the PPSA means affixed according to common law concepts, and that the PPSA did not introduce a bespoke meaning of affixed being a non-trivial attachment as argued by GE.
Factors generally taken in to account when trying to determine if something has been ‘affixed to the land’ are as follows:
The court looked at the terms of the Lease, and it was clear that the turbines were not designed to be affixed to land in a way that would give rise to them being considered a fixture. The following aspects, amongst others, went against the conclusion the turbines were a fixture:
If Australian financiers and lessors were not already on notice of the importance of registration when it comes to the PPSR, then they ought to be following this decision.
It is also apparent that whilst each factual scenario will give rise to its own unique arguments, the pool of arguments available to defeat a vesting claim in the vent of insolvency is starting to run dry.