The item you have requested is not currently available in English and you have been redirected to the next available page. You may use your browser's back button to return to the item you were viewing.
Country desks feature Dentons lawyers in one jurisdiction with a particular focus or experience in another jurisdiction.
Learn more about our Canada capabilities
Learn more about our United States capabilities
Learn more about our Latin America and the Caribbean capabilities
Learn more about our Europe capabilities
Learn more about our United Kingdom capabilities
Learn more about our Central and Eastern Europe capabilities
Learn more about our Russia, CIS and the Caucasus capabilities
Learn more about our Africa capabilities
Learn more about our Middle East capabilities
Learn more about our Central Asia capabilities
Learn more about our China capabilities
Learn more about our ASEAN capabilities
Learn more about our Asia Pacific capabilities
Learn more about our Australia capabilities
At Dentons, we bring together top tier talent found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal expertise. Start by clicking here
More than 225 Dentons lawyers recognised across 99 categories of The Legal 500 UK 2018
Dentons is pleased to announce that the Firm has been ranked in 99 categories in the 2018 edition of The Legal 500 UK, and a total of 226 Dentons lawyers have been recognised across their respective practice areas.
When a cancellation isn’t a cancellation: Cancelling an insurance policy under the Alberta Insurance Act
When it comes to cancelling an insurance policy, both insurers and insureds need to complete the mandated steps.
"Gay marriage" cake: refusal to supply was not discriminatory
In Lee v. Ashers Baking Company Limited and Others, the Supreme Court considered whether a bakery's refusal to supply a cake with a slogan supporting gay marriage was discriminatory on the grounds of sexual orientation or political opinion
Federal autonomous vehicle legislation could get a lame-duck boost
Should Democrats take control of the US House of Representatives, the effort to pass federal autonomous vehicle legislation may be kicked into overdrive.
IRS issues cost of living adjustments to retirement plan limits
The IRS has issued its 2019 cost of living adjustments to retirement plan limits.
Starting your career as a student at Dentons exposes you to a world of experience and opportunities
With 175 locations in 78 countries, Dentons is home to top-tier talent that is found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal experience. Working with Dentons, you will have the opportunity to learn from the best lawyers in the industry at the largest law firm in the world.
Dentons ranked across 66 practice areas in Chambers UK 2019 with leading individuals recognised in 110 categories
Dentons is pleased to announce that it has been recommended across 66 different practice areas by Chambers & Partners in the Chambers UK 2019 guide.
Dentons launches Market Insights publication: “Digital Transformation and the Digital Consumer”
Dentons, the world’s largest law firm, has launched a new Market Insights publication entitled “Digital Transformation and the Digital Consumer”, which examines the legal implications of the online economy.
Dentons celebrates successful first year following merger with Maclay Murray & Spens
Dentons is pleased to celebrate the first anniversary of the Firm's combination with Maclay Murray & Spens, creating a UK footprint of six offices: three in England (London, Milton Keynes and Watford) and three in Scotland (Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen).
On November 9, Orrin Hatch, Chairman of the US Senate Finance Committee, unveiled the Senate's version of comprehensive tax reform. Chairman Hatch released the Senate proposal following approval of the US House of Representatives' tax reform proposal (HR 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) by the House Ways and Means Committee.
The Senate bill has many similarities to the House bill, but it differs in important ways as well.
Unlike the House bill, the Senate bill would retain the current seven-tax-rate bracket structure, although several rates would be lowered slightly. The new top individual tax rate would be 38.5 percent, slightly lower than the 39.6 percent rate retained by the House bill.
Like the House bill, the Senate bill makes no change to capital gains or dividend tax rates. It also retains the 3.8 percent tax on net investment income.
Like the House bill, the Senate bill would index the rate brackets for inflation based on the "chained" Consumer Price Index (CPI), which will generally result in smaller inflation-adjusted increases in the rate brackets and other parts of the tax law that are indexed for inflation, such as the standard deduction.
Like the House bill, the Senate bill would adopt a top corporate tax rate of 20 percent. Unlike the House bill, however, the Senate bill would tax all corporate income at the 20 percent rate and would delay the effective date of the new 20 percent rate until 2019.
The Senate bill would permit individuals to deduct 17.4 percent of their domestic qualified business income from a partnership, S corporation or sole proprietorship. The Senate bill includes limitations and restrictions to limit the deduction so that it does not apply to compensation, guaranteed payments or service providers with incomes in excess of US$150,000. This provision is in lieu of the House bill's lower rate for certain pass-through entities and owners of pass-through entities.
Similar to the House bill, the Senate bill would increase the standard deduction and child tax credit and eliminate personal exemptions. Most itemized deductions, including the deduction for state and local taxes, would be repealed, although:
Certain business losses would be limited for upper-income taxpayers.
Like the House bill, the 70 percent dividends received deduction (DRD) would be reduced to 50 percent and the 80 percent DRD to 65 percent.
Like the House bill, the Senate bill would provide full expensing of equipment acquired between September 27, 2017, and January 1, 2023. In addition, the limits on Section 179 expensing for small businesses would be increased as well. Other changes would apply to the rules for depreciable property.
For businesses with average gross receipts of more than US$15 million, business interest expense would generally be limited to 30 percent of adjusted taxable income, which is similar to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). For businesses operating as partnerships, this limitation is applied at the partnership level. Further, a taxpayer could elect for the limitation not to apply to real estate trades or businesses. The House bill has a similar limitation, although the House provision would not apply to businesses with less than US$25 million in average gross receipts.
Like the House bill, new rules would apply to:
In addition, the Senate bill makes changes to accounting rules and depreciation periods for real property.
Existing business deductions, credits and other incentives would be repealed, including:
Unlike the House bill, the Senate bill does not generally repeal or modify existing business credits. It makes changes, however, to the "orphan" drug credit and the rehabilitation credit, reducing the latter from 20 percent to 10 percent of qualified rehabilitation expenditures.
In measuring gain on the sale of stock, sellers could no longer specifically identify the stock sold and would have to use first-in-first-out or average cost basis. Partnership tax rules would be selectively tightened. New worker classification rules would be adopted.
Both the individual and corporate AMT would be repealed.
Very significant change are made to tax rules for:
Future advance refunding bonds would be taxable, but tax-exempt bonds fare much better in the Senate bill than in the House bill.
The estate and gift tax exemption amount would be doubled to US$10 million and indexed for inflation. Unlike the House bill, the estate tax is not repealed after 2024 and gift tax rates are not reduced.
Although the House and Senate bills contain many similar features, the Senate bill would make more extensive changes to the US international tax rules than would the House bill. The Senate bill borrows more heavily from former Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp's 2014 tax reform bill as well.
Like the House bill, the Senate bill would adopt a 100 percent exemption for dividends from foreign subsidiaries and a "deemed repatriation" provision. The 100 percent dividend exemption is limited to domestic corporations which hold a 10 percent or greater interest in a foreign corporation. It applies only to foreign-source dividends and does not apply to income earned directly by a domestic corporation, for instance, through a branch. The Senate bill also includes special rules dealing with the sale of stock of foreign subsidiaries to take into account the 100 percent dividend exemption.
Like the deemed repatriation provision in the House bill, the deemed repatriation provision in the Senate bill:
In some ways, however, it is harsher than the deemed repatriation provision in the House bill: It applies to all foreign corporations in which a US shareholder owns 10 percent, whether a controlled foreign corporation or not. In other ways, it is more favorable than the House bill:
The Senate bill does not have the "foreign high returns" provision in the House bill, but it has a similar provision which taxes foreign earnings that exceed 10 percent of the aggregate of depreciable property used in a trade or business. Like the House provision, the "global intangible low-taxed income" (GILTI) provision applies to all US shareholders, including individuals. The Senate bill pairs this provision with new incentives to develop (or bring back) intellectual property and export its usage.
The Senate bill does not have the provision in the House bill that imposes an excise tax on payments by domestic corporations to foreign affiliates, with an election by the foreign corporation to avoid the excise tax by paying US corporate income tax. However, the Senate bill has a provision intended to reach a similar result: the "base erosion minimum tax." This base erosion minimum tax effectively requires a domestic corporation that makes deductible payments to a foreign affiliate to pay the higher of (a) a tax equal to 10 percent of its income without any deduction for such otherwise deductible payments to its foreign affiliate ("base erosion payments") and (b) its regular corporate tax liability (reduced only by the R&D tax credit). The base erosion minimum tax applies to domestic corporations that have annual gross receipts in excess of US$500 million and that have a "base erosion percentage" of four percent or higher for the taxable year (the "base erosion percentage" is the domestic corporation's total base erosion payments divided by its total deductible payments).
The Senate bill includes many of the changes to Subpart F made by the House bill, but adds new ones as well. One of the more significant of the new provisions is that the Senate bill would subject to Subpart F all foreign corporations in which a US shareholder owns a 10 percent or greater interest.
Like the House bill, the Senate bill would limit interest deductions of multinational groups. The Senate bill also includes provisions to expand the taxation of cross-border transfers of intellectual property and to address hybrid transactions and entities. It also terminates the domestic international sales corporations (DISC) rules.
The foreign tax credit rules would be loosened in some ways (such as acceleration of the election to allocate interest expense on a worldwide basis) and tightened in other ways (such as a new separate foreign tax credit limitation for foreign branch income and repeal of the fair-market-value interest expense apportionment method).
Passenger cruise ship income would become subject to US tax, as would sales of interests in partnerships engaged in a trade or business in the United States.
The Senate Finance Committee plans to begin consideration, or "markup," of its proposal on November 13. Unlike this week's markup in the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate will work from descriptions of the specific proposals rather than actual legislative text. So, until the Finance Committee finishes the markup process and issues its committee report with legislative language, there will be some uncertainty as to specific details of the provisions in the Senate bill.
The next step for the bill approved by the Ways and Means Committee on November 9 is the House Rules Committee. House Republican leaders are still counting votes but hope to have the bill on the House floor next week. Few, if any amendments, are likely to permitted during House consideration.