The item you have requested is not currently available in English and you have been redirected to the next available page. You may use your browser's back button to return to the item you were viewing.
Country desks feature Dentons lawyers in one jurisdiction with a particular focus or experience in another jurisdiction.
Learn more about our Canada capabilities
Learn more about our United States capabilities
Learn more about our Latin America and the Caribbean capabilities
Learn more about our Europe capabilities
Learn more about our United Kingdom capabilities
Learn more about our Central and Eastern Europe capabilities
Learn more about our Russia, CIS and the Caucasus capabilities
Learn more about our Africa capabilities
Learn more about our Middle East capabilities
Learn more about our Central Asia capabilities
Learn more about our China capabilities
Learn more about our ASEAN capabilities
Learn more about our Asia Pacific capabilities
Learn more about our Australia capabilities
At Dentons, we bring together top tier talent found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal expertise. Start by clicking here
Dentons HPRP wins "Aviation Law Firm of the Year" in the 2018 Indonesia Law Awards
Dentons HPRP wins the “Aviation Law Firm of the Year Award” at the 2018 Indonesia Law Awards in Jakarta, on 4 October 2018.
What’s in a name? When is an “unnamed insured” entitled to insurance proceeds?
Is it possible for a party not named in an insurance policy to be entitled to insurance proceeds under that policy?
Court declines to certify “slack fill” class action
A Missouri federal judge recently denied certification of a proposed “slack fill” class action against the maker of “Mike and Ike” candy.
Changes to the Audiovisual Media Services Directive approved by the European Parliament – what does it mean for the media market?
In October 2018, the European Parliament approved the amendments to the Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2010/13/EU (AVMS Directive) and the Council’s approval is expected imminently.
California breaks new ground in mandating gender diversity on corporate boards
In September 2018, the State of California became the first state in the United States to pass legislation mandating gender diversity in board representation.
Starting your career as a student at Dentons exposes you to a world of experience and opportunities
With 172 locations in 76 countries, Dentons is home to top-tier talent that is found at the intersection of geography, industry knowledge and substantive legal experience. Working with Dentons, you will have the opportunity to learn from the best lawyers in the industry at the largest law firm in the world.
Dentons Rodyk ranked ‘Outstanding’, ‘Highly recommended’ in Asialaw Profiles 2019
Dentons Rodyk is pleased to be ranked in 18 industry sectors and practice areas in Asialaw Profiles 2019.
Mark Withey appointed Partner at Dentons’ Moscow office
Mark Withey has been appointed a partner in Dentons’ Russian Corporate and M&A practice.
Dentons recruits leading Real Estate partner in London
Dentons is pleased to announce that partner Deepa Deb is to join the Firm's Real Estate team in London. Deepa will join from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) where she has been a partner since 2012.
A release is a contract that relieves one or more parties of future liability surrounding certain incidents. Parties often use releases in the context of settlements, to avoid future litigation in connection with the negotiations.
In the past, it has been uncertain how the courts will interpret the general language of standard form releases in the insurance context (i.e. it was not always clear whether broadly-worded releases would be enforceable against unforeseen claims). Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal ( “Court”) provided some clarity on this subject. The Court held that express language is required to exclude claims that were not contemplated, provided that the language of the release is sufficiently broad.
In Biancaniello v. DMCT LLP,1 a law firm and a client signed a mutual release in the context of a legal battle and settlement over unpaid legal fees. In doing so they agreed to release the law firm from liability regarding “any and all services” provided between 2006 and 2007, and “with respect to any and all claims, counterclaims or defences that were pleaded or could have been pleaded.”2 Years later, an unanticipated claim from the period of the firm’s retainer came to light. The law firm had been negligent in a manner that neither party contemplated at the time. The question was did the release apply to the unforeseen claim?
The decisions of the lower courts demonstrate the struggle that existed before the Court’s decision in Biancaniello. Both the motion judge and the appellate court found that the general wording of the release could not bar the client from bringing a claim that they did not know existed.3 The Court stated that this would require “exceptionally comprehensive language” and found that the standard form was not sufficient.4
However, on the motion for leave, Justice Sachs of the Superior Court commented that the issue was open to “serious debate.”5
The Court ultimately decided that the broad wording of the mutual release encompassed claims that existed albeit unknown to the parties when they signed it. In other words, the knowledge and lack thereof of a period to the specific claim available to it may not matter if the release is sufficiently broad. The Court considered the intention of the parties at the time of signing.6 It found that because the release was given as part of a settlement agreement, its purpose was to “wipe the slate clean” in respect of the dispute (i.e. the services performed by the firm),7 Because the negligence related directly to that dispute, and given the broad language of the release, it could not be said that the parties did not agree to bar this litigation.8 The court found that:
Professional liability insurers can take some comfort in the Court’s recent decision on interpreting releases, as long as insureds use clear and express language to exclude unforeseen future litigation. This will be relevant when agreeing to a release in the settlement context.
2017 ONCA 386↩
2 Ibid at para 6. ↩
3 Ibid at para 12.↩
4 Ibid at para 15.↩
5 Ibid at para 13.↩
6 Ibid at para 41.↩
7 Ibid at para 42.↩
8 Ibid at para 51.↩
9 Ibid at paras 50 and 52.↩
The URL of this tweet is below. Copy it to easily share with friends.
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more