One of the key steps to an efficient dispute resolution process is having well-drafted dispute resolution provisions. If a contract provides that disputes be finally resolved by arbitration and the arbitration agreement is treated as invalid or unenforceable, there could be protracted and costly disputes over the agreed method of dispute resolution. When arbitration is the agreed method of dispute resolution, a poorly drafted arbitration agreement could lead to disputes on the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal over the entirety or part of a dispute under the contract. This article examines the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement.
Qatar Arbitration Law No. 2 of 2017, which replaced the old articles from 190 to 210 of the Qatari Civil and Commercial Procedures Code No. 13 of 1990, regulates arbitration proceedings in Qatar.
Article 7(1) of the Qatar Arbitration Law defines an arbitration agreement as:
"the agreement of the Parties who, whether they are legal or natural persons, have the legal capacities necessary to agree to recourse to Arbitration to settle all or some disputes that have arisen or may arise between them".
Article 7(3) also stipulates that an arbitration agreement must be in writing, otherwise it will be null and void. An arbitration clause in a contract will be deemed an arbitration agreement, independent from other clauses in the contract, if the arbitration clause clearly incorporates the terms of an arbitration agreement by reference (Articles 7(5) and 16(1)). Accordingly, an arbitration clause should contain the key provisions of an arbitration agreement to avoid disputes and to ensure that the arbitration agreement is valid.
The following key provisions should be included in an arbitration agreement (or an arbitration clause in a contract) to avoid disputes and ambiguity:
A common mistake that causes disputes between parties in an arbitration is the failure to differentiate between the seat or legal place and the place or venue of an arbitration. There is an important difference between the two. The seat or legal place of arbitration determines the procedural law that will apply to the arbitration proceedings, whereas the place or venue of arbitration is the physical location at which the arbitration hearing takes place. Both provisions should be set out clearly and separately in an arbitration agreement.
Parties choose arbitration as the preferred method of dispute resolution because it has the advantage of being private and confidential. It also has the ease of being enforced in other jurisdictions when compared with judgments in foreign courts, where assets are located in other jurisdictions.
Having a detailed and thoroughly drafted arbitration agreement could assist in increasing the efficiency of arbitration proceedings. Poorly drafted arbitration agreements could cause disputes between parties and inevitably lead to increased cost and significant delays in resolving disputes under their underlying contracts. This may mean that disputes are referred to the local courts if the arbitration agreement is treated as invalid or unenforceable, which may provide an unsatisfactory outcome for the parties.