﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Dentons - Insights]]></title><description>Dentons Insights</description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/rss-feeds/insights</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 20:45:27 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:29:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[ATO increases software royalty withholding tax coverage in new guidance]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Australia:</strong> The ATO&rsquo;s release of <em>TR 2026/2</em> marks a significant development in the taxation of cross-border software, licensing and SaaS arrangements. The ruling modernises the ATO&rsquo;s approach to royalty characterisation, expands its focus to rights associated with technological protection measures, and reinforces that tax outcomes will depend on the substance of the rights granted rather than contractual labels. It also highlights the continuing importance of treaty-specific analysis, particularly where treaty definitions diverge from Australia&rsquo;s standard royalty provisions. This insight examines the ATO&rsquo;s key positions, recent judicial developments, practical compliance considerations, and the implications for multinational technology businesses operating in Australia.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/ato-increases-software-royalty-withholding-tax-coverage</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/ato-increases-software-royalty-withholding-tax-coverage</guid><category>Tax</category><category>Tax in Australia</category><category>Intellectual Property and Technology</category><category>Intellectual Property and Technology in Australia</category><category>Technology, Media and Telecommunications</category><category>Technology</category><category>Technology in Australia</category><category>Australasia</category><category>Australia</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/space/adobestock_436033643.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=3A336D854E8D91DD6222FD83D4E36043" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cross-border employment in Nigeria: What foreign employers need to know]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nigeria:&nbsp;</strong>Cross-border employment arrangements are becoming increasingly common in Nigeria. It is now routine for non-resident companies to engage Nigerian employees, deploy expatriates into Nigeria for an assignment or manage personnel working remotely from Nigeria without establishing a local subsidiary. While these arrangements offer commercial flexibility, they also raise important tax and compliance questions for both employers and employees.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentonsacaslaw.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/cross-border-employment-in-nigeria-what-foreign-employers-need-to-know</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentonsacaslaw.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/cross-border-employment-in-nigeria-what-foreign-employers-need-to-know</guid><category>Labor and Employment</category><category>Africa</category><category>Nigeria</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/abstract/adobestock_238995660.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=E763E9A1B5776AA90E1B02D9CB5669D8" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deferred commencement conditions: What happens when the clock runs out before Council has considered the material you submitted?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Australia</strong>: Deferred commencement conditions are often time consuming to satisfy. But this is a sobering reminder that not only do you, as the applicant, need to give yourself enough time to prepare and lodge the material required by the relevant condition, but that you need to factor in sufficient time for Council to satisfy itself that the condition has been met (depending on the wording of the deferred commencement condition).</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/deferred-commencement-conditions-what-happens-when-the-clock-runs-out-before-council</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/deferred-commencement-conditions-what-happens-when-the-clock-runs-out-before-council</guid><category>Real Estate</category><category>Development Zoning and Planning</category><category>Development Zoning and Planning in Australia</category><category>Project Development</category><category>Real Estate</category><category>Construction and Engineering</category><category>Construction in Australia</category><category>Developers and Owners</category><category>Australia</category><category>Australasia</category><category>Asia Pacific</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/patterns/adobestock_322819018.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=0FBC4B68552BAC3C89BB999A351D429C" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[Going ITAR-free: Caution and opportunity]]></title><description><![CDATA[<strong>New Zealand</strong>:&nbsp;The case for being &ldquo;ITAR-free&rdquo;, currently being advanced by Western European nations has an obvious appeal. Self-sufficiency is popular, dependency is unpopular, and the political mood in European capitals has shifted decisively towards building things at home. This debate has even spread recently to the western aligned nations of the Indo-Pacific.&nbsp;]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.co.nz/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/24/going-itar-free---caution-and-opportunity</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.co.nz/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/24/going-itar-free---caution-and-opportunity</guid><category>Corporate</category><category>Trade, WTO and Customs</category><category>International Trade</category><category>Export Controls</category><category>Aviation and Aerospace</category><category>Technology</category><category>Aerospace and Defense</category><category>Aviation and Aerospace</category><category>New Zealand</category><category>Auckland</category><category>Christchurch</category><category>Wellington</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/abstract/adobestock_324506294.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=68071BA103F8C56E36B38E6579DCDF2E" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[Legal Alert: Tanzania introduces mandatory inbound travel insurance for foreign visitors]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tanzania:</strong>&nbsp;The government of the United Republic of Tanzania has issued the Insurance (Inbound Travel Insurance) Regulations, 2026 pursuant to section 134A (5) of the Insurance Act, Cap. 394. The Regulations introduce mandatory inbound travel insurance for certain foreign nationals entering mainland Tanzania. Affected travellers who do not possess a valid policy may be denied entry.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/tanzania-introduces-mandatory-inbound-travel-insurance-for-foreign-visitors</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/tanzania-introduces-mandatory-inbound-travel-insurance-for-foreign-visitors</guid><category>Insurance Practice</category><category>Immigration</category><category>Litigation and Dispute Resolution</category><category>Transportation Practice</category><category>Tanzania</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/ocean/adobestock_134537443.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=BF36843A5FB79FAE9410EB21FEF73B63" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[NAIC Review of Residential Mortgage Investments Could Reshape Insurer Classification, Reporting and Capital Requirements]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The NAIC is reviewing whether insurers’ residential mortgage investments are being classified, reported, and assigned risk-based capital charges in a manner that accurately reflects the underlying risks. The review could lead to clearer definitions, expanded reporting requirements, and potentially higher or more risk-sensitive capital charges for certain loans.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/naic-review-of-residential-mortgage-investments</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/naic-review-of-residential-mortgage-investments</guid><category>Capital Markets</category><category>Insurance in the United States</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/abstract/istock-1126242595.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=60F740363BFF9123B6214D354DBEDC38" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[No disclosure, no deal: Why you can’t CCAA your way out of REDMA]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of British Columbia’s August 25, 2026 reasons in KingSett Mortgage Corporation v. Lumina Eclipse Limited Partnership are some of the most illuminating statements about developer disclosure obligations in years. </p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/no-disclosure-no-deal-why-you-cant-ccaa-your-way</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/no-disclosure-no-deal-why-you-cant-ccaa-your-way</guid><category>Development Zoning and Planning</category><category>Development Zoning and Planning in Canada</category><category>Real Estate</category><category>Real Estate in Canada</category><category>Commercial Development</category><category>Residential and Condominium Development</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/abstract/adobestock_178290057.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=49E0175056EFA8CA595B274F519EE417" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nominate later, pay duty twice? VCAT says yes]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Australia:</strong> This insight explores the Ramaihi v Commissioner of State Revenue [2026] VCAT 655 decision and its implications for Victoria&rsquo;s sub-sale duty provisions. VCAT confirmed that an intention to nominate a purchaser is insufficient to avoid double duty where the nominee entity does not exist when the contract is signed. The Tribunal held that transfer rights arise only once a nominee is established and formally nominated, meaning land development undertaken beforehand can trigger additional duty. The decision also highlights the risk of penalty tax where specific duty advice is not obtained and underscores the importance of establishing acquisition structures before contracting.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/nominate-later-pay-duty-twice</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/nominate-later-pay-duty-twice</guid><category>Real Estate</category><category>Real Estate in Australia</category><category>Tax</category><category>Tax in Australia</category><category>Australia</category><category>Melbourne</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/fruit/istock-1139626978.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=5296D03C34215204A258ACFB8EE3624E" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show Me My File:</br>What Employers Must Do Before New York's Personnel Records Law Takes Effect]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>United States:</strong> For the first time, New York employees will have a statutory right to inspect their own personnel files—and employers face an aggressive compliance timeline. On September 9, 2026, Governor Kathy Hochul signed Senate Bill 3460, adding Section 210-b to the New York Labor Law. The law takes effect November 8, 2026, giving employers barely two months to prepare.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/what-employers-must-do-before-new-yorks-personnel-records-law-takes-effect</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/alerts/2026/september/28/what-employers-must-do-before-new-yorks-personnel-records-law-takes-effect</guid><category>Employment and Labor in the United States</category><category>United States</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/abstract/adobestock_292612979.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=D9B2EAD590064A98FEBF6D02055566B7" height="140" width="177" /></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Upper Tribunal decision in <em>Odey v FCA</em>: governance, integrity and accountability under the SMCR]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>United Kingdom</strong>: The Upper Tribunal's decision in Robin Crispin Odey v Financial Conduct Authority [2026] UKUT 351 (TCC)&nbsp; provides an important examination of the relationship between non-financial misconduct (NFM), individual integrity and the governance of FCA-regulated firms.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/the-upper-tribunal-decision-in-odey-v-fca</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2026/september/28/the-upper-tribunal-decision-in-odey-v-fca</guid><category>Financial Institutions Regulatory</category><category>Compliance and Risk Management</category><category>Corporate Governance</category><category>Directors and Officers</category><category>Internal Corporate Investigations</category><category>White Collar and Government Investigations</category><category>Financial Services Litigation</category><category>Hedge Funds</category><category>Financial Institutions</category><category>United Kingdom</category><category>London</category><media:thumbnail url="https://www.dentons.com/-/media/images/website/background-images/gpof/geology/adobestock_251786382.ashx?h=140&amp;mh=140&amp;mw=180&amp;w=177&amp;crop=1&amp;hash=84E8717A1111F47068F9C95A2F52CC71" height="140" width="177" /></item></channel></rss>